Friday, November 21, 2008

BUY THE BOOK TODAY!

NOW IN PAPERBACK!


   "Guaranteed to make the blood boil"
- The New York Times 


"Not to be missed by anyone concerned about the future of America and the West"
- Robert Bork


"Illuminating and provocative"
- Lou Dobbs


"A must-read for anyone who wants to understand why...many in the West are apologetic when confronted with the excesses of radical islam and what we need to do to win the War on Terror. This is a phenomenal book that will truly alter the way you view society"
- Steven Emerson


"Vigorously argued, far-reaching and timely"
- Paul Johnson


"What makes West's invaluable analysis stand apart is her connection of the death of the grown-up to the post-9/11 political, intellectual and moral paralysis that imperils us today."
- Michelle Malkin


"Penetrating and witty"
- George F. Will

Subscribe to Blog

RSS Feed 

 



Good Riddance
Location: BlogsDiana WestGeneral    
Posted by: Diana West Wednesday, December 05, 2007 7:54 AM

As I wend my way through my veritable library of Clinton Scandals Past (column to follow), I have happened across two good reasons to say Good Riddance to longtime Republican Senator from Mississippi Trent Lott, who announced his retirement from the Senate at the end of November.
    Good Riddance #1 comes from Sell-Out: The Inside Story of President Clinton's Impeachment by David Schippers, the chief cousel to the 13 House Managers, led by the late Henry Hyde. After the historic vote in the House of Representatives to impeach President Clinton in December of 1998, Mr. Schippers writes of a meeting he attended with the House Managers, a few others, and then-Senate Majority Leader Lott and then-Senator Rick Santorum (Pennsylvania Republican) to discuss the Senate trial to come.
    Right away we were pumped up, not yet knowing we were living in a fool's paradise. We figured, okay, here's our chance to tell the Senate Republican leader what we need to conduct the impeachment trial and make all the evidence available, not just to the Senate, but to the American people as a whole....
    Lott leaned back in his chair with a power lean that said, "I'm in charge." I'll never forget the first words out of his mouth: "Henry, you're not going to dump this garbage on us."
     "Huh?" came the bewildered reply from House Judiciary Committee Chairman Henry Hyde, Republican of Illinois.
    "You're not going to dump this garbage on us."
    ...Stupid me, I guess I thought everything was on the legit, too. But no, it was clear right off the bat that things were not all legit. The Republican leadership wanted to sink us.
   
And, of course, the Senate Republican leadership did exactly that.
    Good Riddance #2 comes from Absolute Power: The Legacy of Corruption in the Clinton-Reno Justic Department by David Limbaugh. In the run-up to the  1996 investigation led by then-Sen. Fred Thompson (Tennessee Republican) into  the extensive, dirty, ugly Clinton campaign finance scandals then coming to public attention--and NEVER, EVER fully reckoned with (hint of column to come)--Senate Republicans (led by Trent Lott) capitulated to Democratic demands that the investigation be broadened (neutered) to include the general need for campaign finance reform. This meant that  the hearings wouldn't focus on criminal violations by the Clinton White House, which, of course, meant that the hearings wouldn't focus, period. That was bad enough.
    But here's where Sen. Lott really shined (not):
    Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott then acquiesced to another Democratic demand and imposed a December 31,1997, deadline on the investigation. Thompson warned that the deadline would give the White House an incentive to stonewall and to withhold requested documents. Thompson's prediection was born out. His committee's postinvestigation report made this observation: "The imposition of the ... deadline virtually invited witnesses to engage in obstructive tactics, perhaps none more than the DNC and the White House. This obstruction, combined with the sheer complexity of the investigation, made this deadline the single greatest obstacle faced by the Committee's inquiry."
    Thanks for everything, Trent!
    Remind me not to attend your testimonial dinner.

Permalink |  Trackback
Men, Women... or Children

Once, there was a world without teenagers. Literally, "teenager," the word itself, doesn't pop into the lexicon much before 1941. That means that for all but this most recent period of history, there were children and there were adults. Children in their teen years aspired to adulthood; significantly, they didn't aspire to adolescence. Certainly, men and women didn't aspire to remain teenagers.

Today, turning thirteen, instead of bringing children closer to an adult world, launches them into a teen universe. And due to the hold our culture has placed on the maturation process, that's where they're likely to find the adults.

Most of us have grown up--or, at least, grown--into this new kind of adulthood, this perpetual adolescence so much the norm that it's difficult to recognize it as the profound civilizational shift that it is. Here to help is this blog, which will monitor the news of the day to keep tabs on the "Grown-Up" and the "Not Grown-Up" among us.



Links
Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use
Copyright 2008 by Diana West